Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LSDJ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

LSDJ

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. This is not even remotely close to being notable. JBsupreme (talk) 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot find any singificant coverage for this topic. Angryapathy (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this cartridge. Joe Chill (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable homebrew product.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 23:50, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * KeepThis IS quite an important product in the creation of Bitpop / Chiptune / 8-bit music; it actualy was a trend-setting product. Deleting this because it's not noteworthy enough must be viewed like deleting the banjo aricle because you don't listen to western, please redonsider. Chiptune is gaining popularity (at least in europe) as a dance music style : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiptune#Modern_incarnations —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.11.192.119 (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Google Books lists over eight thousand books about banjos; zero for this particular topic.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 15:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  08:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  08:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any mention of this in gbooks, and almost all the ghits are duplicates of this article, or youtube videos. In short, I don't see the 2 WP:RS required by WP:GNG. Joshua Scott (talk) 02:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

yo i'm just gonna lazily edit this page to make a point to you guys but uhhh I dunno about y'all homies and all but 240k results sound pretty significant to me https://i.imgur.com/BsiayUT.png

meanwhile open MPT gets like 140k https://i.imgur.com/gakVan0.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMPT so what's this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/ (talk) 03:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)