Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LTTE and Maoist Relations 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

LTTE and Maoist Relations
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This AfD is a relist of the previous AfD on this matter due to the influence of a sockfarm. Soman's nomination rationale was that the article is merely an essay copypasta'd from various news sources. -Jéské ( v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing ) 16:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as that's exactly what the article appears to be. so that's where all my missing socks are, and all this time I was blaming the dryer! TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 17:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Dgf32 (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as well. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No RS given and has not been covered by major news sources that are respected. This is just another propaganda in the long running Sri Lankan Civil War. Closer look at the citations can assert that the citation used are once that have not been ever used on wikipedia and seems more like attack sites and random blogs rather than RS. Furthermore one RS citation is the US embassy but that citation does not even call any links between the two rebel groups. The other, Rediff, merely claims that the Moist claimed that they were Trained by the LTTE but this claim says it was decade ago and was assisted by "On the run" LTTE cadres. This is mere accusation and creating an article from accusations is not what we do in wikipedia. Other sources given are either citation of Sri Lankan Government and their associates like Asian Tribune. Writing an article from accusation of one of the warring party is in direct violation of WP:NPOV. Watchdogb (talk) 13:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomTaprobanus (talk) 22:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.