Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LX/LuelinX 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus, keep. Johnleemk | Talk 08:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

LX/LuelinX
Relisting for AfD, too few votes last time at: Articles for deletion/LX/LuelinX. No vote. The Land 19:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep - provides useful links and is informative about the project. Keep - it is not affiliated with "LUElinks" at all. -Matt 20:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NOt affiliated with LUElinks, but not notable either. Few Google hits, Wikipedia is top site on Google.  Looks very minor indeed. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 21:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:49, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Stifle 02:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It's notable. The project is rather active, and does have its merits. Additionally, the above delete (JunkieVegeta is a faggot), was a personal bias, and shouldn't count as a vote. --NSA 21:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, vanity
 * Keep I see no reason to remove it. Sartak 15:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

This entire discussion is pointless. The entire point of this AfD discussion is for people from LUElinks to come and troll (i.e. whine). Should be invalidated as biased. -Matt 06:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Also, to add on to the "not notable" argument: it is consistently at above the 97 percentile mark in SF.net activity, and a couple months ago reached the top 200 projects. -Matt 07:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.