Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LYCONET


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Lyoness. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

LYCONET

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails notability with reliable sources being primarily about Lyoness. Related to Articles for deletion/MyWorld. IgelRM (talk) 21:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Austria. IgelRM (talk) 21:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Keep per presented sufficient newspaper coverage and general notability presented as a significant cashback entity, possibly one of the first global ones (operating since 2003).--Welcome to Pandora (talk) 08:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, but how is it different from Lyoness? IgelRM (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Lyoness as per WP:ATD - this topic fails the criteria for establishing notability on its own merit, a redirect is the sensible alternative to deletion.  HighKing++ 13:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.