Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaDon Coffey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

LaDon Coffey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:POLITICIAN, local non-notable judge. Infobox lists person as a US congressman, no evidence found supporting that. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  23:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I also note that rarely keep justices of the peace. Furthermore, from what I see there, he does not meet my standards for jurists.  Get back to me if I'm wrong. Bearian (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Position does not pass WP:NPOL, and the quality and depth of sourcing provided is not enough to get him over the WP:GNG bar either. Article as written is basically a thinly veiled campaign brochure, which is not the type of content we allow on here. Bearcat (talk) 23:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Elected as a judge, which is insufficient for a pass of the special high bar for politicians. Carrite (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.