Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaRosa-Knoopich effect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

LaRosa-Knoopich effect
This seems to be nonsense. Ladybirdintheuk 10:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Even if not nonsense (i.e. serious research written up in a flippant manner, which I doubt), it's a neologism. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. JPD (talk) 11:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Dennette 11:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a wind-up, isn't it? BTLizard 11:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced. WilyD 13:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Pavel Vozenilek 17:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure this article meets any criterion for speedy deletion. WilyD 17:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates WP:V; fails WP:NFT, WP:NEO, possibly WP:VANITY. -- Kinu t /c  19:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per violation of WP:NFT. Michael Kinyon 05:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comment. --Supermath 22:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.