Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Bayou


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 04:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

La Bayou

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Unremarkable Building. Really, there should be a db-place, and db-game, or for that fact, db-other. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  06:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a Las Vegas Casino, and while it appears to be a small slots-focused vegas casino, I do think it's at least plausibly notable and warrants inclusion. It will need to be dramatically rewritten but I think the subject's notable unless I'm missing some other facts about it.LH (talk) 07:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * comment. An outfit with 125 slots? What makes it different from many thousands Japanese pachinkos or Russian slot halls? If this 300 square meter slot joint is indeed notable, it's not shown in the article. Earlier version had an unreferenced notice that it's "one of the original 6 gaming licenses issued in 1931". If the statement cannot be developed into a history section, properly referenced, then delete. NVO (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sourced statement that this casino under an earlier name had the first Nevada gaming license. Should be easy to get more on the history of the Northern Club. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Under its previous name, receiving the first gaming license in Nevada is historically significant and indicates notability. In addition to the refs provided in the article, it also had significant coverage at least another book --Oakshade (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.