Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Caffettiera Stioppeta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm sorry Laszlocser but the consensus is that they still do not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

La Caffettiera Stioppeta

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no indication of WP:notability. Only reference is not significant coverage. Google searches do not provide anything better. Disputed Prod. noq (talk) 23:51, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Notability has not been established for the article, the reference listed is an entry in a calendar of events, although I don't speak Hungarian so I don't know if it is a site that allows user submissions (and thus being a WP:SPS), but it is a very weak third-party source regardless, and as that it the only source, it is not enough to establish the notability of the article's subject. - SudoGhost&trade; 01:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I also tried searching under their Hungarian name with somewhat more results but, alas, only trivial coverage, i.e. concert announcements. Voceditenore (talk) 08:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * |external link as proof of notability in German Online Newspaper (Hamburger Online) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laszlocser (talk • contribs) 12:53, 22 July 2011
 * This article is a brief mention, and does not meet WP:GNG (significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject), and certainly does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. - SudoGhost 20:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree, an extremely trivial mention. The article is about a completely different (and equally non-notable) youth choir and mentions that they were participating in some kind of cultural exchange involving two other youth choirs, one of which was La Caffettiera Stioppeta. It doesn't come close to meeting the requirements for significant coverage. Voceditenore (talk) 07:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG / WP:MUSICBIO (but sounds good). Stuartyeates (talk) 00:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * DONE: rework of the references. DONE: Album cover was added. The international contest in Arrezo is internationally renowned. Not every choir is allowed to join, but only a number of preselected ones which must qualify. This choir has managed to qualify into the 13 finalists on a world wide basis http://www.polifonico.org/ User talk:Laszlocser 9:32 PM 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * National Radio and the National Museum is also not meant for every choir. User talk:Laszlocser 9:32 PM 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Which criteria of WP:MUSICBIO does it now fulfill in order to be an article on Wikipedia? It still doesn't meet #1, as all of the references still appear trivial. - SudoGhost 20:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Nr. 12. The performance on 29.05.2005 at the Hungarian National Gallery was recorder by the National Radio as part of the Series "Hangverseny Délidőben"(=Concert at noon). The recording is avalible at the archive http://www.radio.hu/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=69&Itemid=124 and can be ordered here: http://www.radio.hu/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=59&Itemid=89 Order form: http://www.radio.hu/down/Megrendelolapok.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laszlocser (talk • contribs) 21:38, 23 July 2011 User talk:Laszlocser 9:32 PM 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That doesn't seem to fulfill Criteria #12 of WP:MUSICBIO. Being recorded and available for sale isn't the same thing as being the featured subject (not one of many) of a substantial broadcast segment. - SudoGhost 21:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.