Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Cartita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

La Cartita

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article lacks reliable sources and a quick Google search will show that the notability of this organization is in question. The article is standing on a single mention made by TeleSur (a video about the protests, but no mention of the organization is mentioned in the source). If you see the video, La Cartita is shown in a Twitter post. That's about it. This article also makes absolute statements of fact about the Mexican government slandering political groups favoring La Cartita, but yet gives no source to back this up. ComputerJA ( ☎  •  ✎  ) 00:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

There are no citations for the notion that somehow one political group favours La Cartita or not. Political affiliation looks difficult to pin down. No political group is actually named so it becomes difficult to evaluate validity (let alone veracity). Telesur cites the content of the news wire's original video and shared the twitter feed, which is standard practice for videos of that nature. That means there is some minimum amount of validation on the dimension of newsworthiness. Its an emerging website from an emerging market by its own description, which likely explains scale. As for absolutist statements, its an unfortunate state of affairs that in Mexico the easy part of their crimes is documenting them. An independent international court (the InterAmerican Court of Human rights) issued several statements condemning the government at every level. A sad state of affairs, indeed. Regards.

They do have terrible SEO, I must say, which certainly clogs up the Google search. Horrid!
 * Hi, unfortunately La Carita fails to meet our notability requirements. Please see WP:ORG for more details. I hope this clarifies my concern a bit more. Cheers, ComputerJA ( ☎  •  ✎  ) 02:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The references advanced to support notability do not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and cannot find any other sources to satisfy notability requirements. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.