Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Luz Property


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   18:26, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

La Luz Property
Fairly obvious advertising. Article makes no assertation of its nobility. Fails WP:CORP as far as I can see. Stu  ’Bout ye!  14:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, original prod tag was removed. Stu   ’Bout ye!  14:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I can't really tell. A search for "La Luz propoerty" (in quotes) on google returns 87 000 hits, but the company does not seem terribly notable.  Maybe I'm missing something. — Mets 501  (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The google search is misleading as it brings up hits like "If you are looking for Costa De La Luz Property, then you should try Spanish Venture property", referring to the general Costa De La Luz area in Andalucía. Stu   ’Bout ye!  08:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability, advertisement that fails WP:CORP. It's fairly possible that they're using Wikipedia as a promotional tool (or they hired someone to do it), as the main editor is Bostonprops. --Coredesat talk 21:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:CORP guidelines. --Arnzy (whats up?)  21:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability --Starionwolf 04:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.