Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Petite Reine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SpinningSpark 23:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

La Petite Reine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was created by a well known sockpuppeteer, Alma Fordy. It was created by this user who was blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. There are not enough sources for this article. It also fails WP:GNG. Evil Idiot (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 22.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. It's not always easy to determine whether a given source is offering significant coverage of the company, of Langmann, or of one of the works it produced (especially the complicated co-production credit for The Artist – and, yes, WP:NOTINHERITED and all that). But I think in the aggregate, there's enough. Most sources, predictably, are in French. This, from Le Figaro discusses the company's financial difficulties, so a potential article needn't be puffery. This, from Entreprendre gives a bit of history of the company from better times (back in 2015). Clearly, what we have here... isn't very good, but I think the topic is notable. Note that this article isn't eligible for CSD G5 as block evasion; although it was indeed created by serial sockpuppeteer Alma Fordy, it was created by the original account prior to the first blocks. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified above, passes WP:GNGAtlantic306 (talk) 19:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * keep Passes the GNG. cinco deL3X1 ◊distænt write◊  23:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The coverage identified by Squeamish Ossifrage seems to be of a substantial enough nature to let the article pass GNG, though, I would agree it's probably right on the edge. And, the article does need to be cleaned-up (and aforementiond sources added). Chetsford (talk) 23:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Thomas Langmann, where most of the information already is. Topic may turn out to be notable, but work can still be done on it while it's a redirect (preferably in draft).Deb (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.