Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Ville Rouge (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''delete. Since there have been no significant changes to the article from the last AFD, I'm calling this a recreation of deleted content. It's substantively the same, and no strong case for keeping it has been made. Ordinarily I'd lean towards "no consensus, default to keep", but in this case, this article (or a substantively similar one) has already gone through the process and been deleted. I'm going to uphold that ruling.'''. - Philippe 18:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

La Ville Rouge (2nd nomination)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page was put up for deletion 2 years ago; the consensus was to delete, and it was. Since that time, a new article was created. However, it has not addressed the reason behind the first deletion: the horse is simply not notable outside of being related to a Kentucky Derby winner. Grev (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I don't know much about horses, but there's a lot of coverage about this one. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 21:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastordavid (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. First AfD, which was a pretty unanimous consensus to delete.  Pastordavid (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment yep the nom noted that. Consensus can change, but it doesn't appear this is going to get much comment TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 01:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOT a genealogical database, and this is just a horse genealogy entry.  Quale (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.