Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laagi Tujhse Lagan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Laagi Tujhse Lagan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was closed as redirect before, but with only one person taking part. Closer has suggested it be renominated as a user is refusing to accept the outcome of the first AfD. I have no opinion on the notability Ged  UK  20:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - I was the one who contested reviewing of deleting this article. This Show "Laagi Tujhse Lagan is a popular show in India and gets the highest rating and is in top 11 show of India.TRP HERE. There stands NO BASIS for deleting the article. The article categories in WikiProject_Television and should be expanded NOT deleted. Wikipedia has millions of television show page so why not this? Why not just add a stub tag or expand tag rather than deleting it. People in other countries may not understand what the show is and might be stumped with title which is written in Hindi. And regarding how "Notable" the show is, people should just Google the title and "Laagi Tujhse Lagan wiki" stands the second in google search. Deleting this article stands absolutely unfair as per wikipedia policy. How come one television show page is deleted whereas there are millions of television articles out there in Wikipedia. Deleting the page Makes NO SENSE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyn9 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete/Redirect to Colors (TV channel) - It's called the General notability guideline, and this article's subject seems to be seriously lacking in "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" … it takes more than links to the network's website about the subject, or blog postings by fans. Happy Editing! &mdash;  00:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 05:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: One of the "top 10 television shows that have got highets TRPs" -- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - That mere mention is hardly "significant coverage", and what is a "TRP" supposed to be? &mdash; 70.21.16.94 (talk) 20:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 07:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - if the "keep" commenters could provide reliable sources to show that this article meets WP:GNG (and, ideally add them to the article) and if all participants could provide full, policy-referencing rationales for their !vote, I would be very grateful. Ironholds (talk) 05:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. If the "delete" commenters could just take a couple of seconds to click on the word "news" in the nomination and look at the first few articles found I would be very grateful. The only possible way not to find reliable sources is not to bother to look for them. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.