Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laalkuthi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No analysis of the sources presented has occurred. A fourth re-list is inadvisable. Therefore give it a bit of time for those who argue the topic is notable to improve the article. If the article is not improved with in-depth, independent, reliable sources then it should be brought back here again. And hopefully with not as many WP:VAGUEWAVES. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Laalkuthi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Pay-TV series doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in non-WP:ROUTINE sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like advertising. The first six sources are announcements, not in-depth sources. The rest are the ratings that add nothing to the content of the article. The Banner  talk 10:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: I couldn’t find any statrment saying that pay-TV doesn’t meet WP:GNG. Dora Shin 15, 14:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Pay-TV on its own not, but without reliable, in-depth sources it does fail WP:GNG. The Banner  talk 14:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep -, , , These sources on this page have enough coverage.  103.102.138.10 (talk) 23:59,  4 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Only TRP stuff is there, doesn't seems notable. 49.33.233.14 (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete more then 75% of the page is cast lists, and as far as i can see 50% of the sources are from the same place -Bad At This, The Kneecap Destroyer (yell at me) 18:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - This page contains enough reliable sources that pass WP:GNG. Nilpriyo (talk) 06:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:GNG, needs more English sources to even consider it. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 12:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1AmNobody24, There is no requirement that sources be in English to satisfy WP:N. (I'm not saying these sources do the job.) — Jacona (talk) 19:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Jacona I know that per WP:N "Sources do not have to be available online or written in English." But it can be an indication that it might not be notable for the English Wikipedia if there are no or only little english sources. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 09:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.