Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laboratoire d'ingénierie des systèmes de Versailles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Laboratoire d'ingénierie des systèmes de Versailles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:NCORP  HighKing++ 13:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep since subject [15 January 2019 edit :] The mother university passes the notability criterion for universities, i.e. WP:GNG. There's a plethora of sources for the full name or its abbreviated form UVSQ, i.e. "Journée Portes Ouvertes UVSQ UFR des Sciences Sociales" in Le Figaro; "L'université Versailles-Saint-Quentin n'exclut pas de fermer" in Le Monde; "Faillite silencieuse de la fac de Saint-Quentin" and "Saint-Quentin, une université plus capable de se payer de livres" in Libération; "Austérité et bouts de ficelle, l'université Versailles sort du rouge" in L'Express, "L'université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin retrouve son autonomie budgétaire" in France Info; etc.
 * It also appears that the subject mother institution has been audited by the state's Comité national d'évaluation des établissements publics à caractère scientifique, culturel et professionnel (here). -The Gnome (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I submit my !vote further below. -The Gnome (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 01:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Correction : It seems I fell for the old "false link" trick in the Languages bar. An editor linked the contested article to the French-language article for the Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, which is notable and already has its own article in this Wikipedia. Which is why I found & posted up those links; they are about the university. This AfD, however, is about merely a laboratory run by the university, a lab that possesses no notability at all on its own. (There isn't an article about the lab in the French-language Wikipedia.) My suggestion therefore for the actual contested article is a Strong Delete. -The Gnome (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Userfy or Dratify. Page requires more into to look encyclopedicMgbo120 (talk) 11:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.