Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labour Campaign for Electoral Reform


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Labour Party (UK). (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Labour Campaign for Electoral Reform

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet Wikipedia General Notability Guidelines Alligators1974 (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 29.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 12:36, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 15:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 15:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment A long-standing group within the Labour Party. See for example this 1998 BBC report. The reference that I've added describes it as "the largest campaigning group in the Party". AllyD (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   22:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)




 * Merge to Labour Party (UK). Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources is proving difficult to find, but it's certainly verifiable. The Labour Party (UK) article presently does not mention the movement. NorthAmerica1000 18:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge - I agree with the above suggestion - it is not significant enough in it's own right IMO. Alligators1974 (talk) 15:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.