Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacdan family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, unverified and notability not established. Davewild (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Lacdan family

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability and verifiability in question. Google search (Philippines only) did not give substantial verifiable sources. Article has no cited sources since April 2007. Also the creator might have COI Lenticel  ( talk ) 06:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment. I may be out of step, but I don't like COI as grounds for deletion. Someone with a COI could write a NPOV article and someone without could write a POV one. I prefer to judge on notability. Surely justice is blind? Annamonckton (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, COI is not grounds for deletion (though it is preferable for those with COI not to edit articles of subjects with which they have a close association). Verifiability is the major issue here. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Very few ghits indicates non-notability. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 22:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, unsourced, and written like a memorial. Starczamora (talk) 23:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.