Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lachrymology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirects are cheap. -- Mike (Kicking222) 20:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Lachrymology

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested by IP editor. This seems to be a non notable hoax religion. Beyond the mere fact that it was invented by progressive rock band Tool, it is not referenceable from independent sources. WjBscribe 00:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per non-notable, no reliable sources. It's not like it made the news or anything, and only fans of the band (myself included) know anything of or about it. (It's also over 10 years old now, many new fans wouldn't know about it unless they'd read a fan site, and it doesn't even appear on album covers or in anything official from the band - it was simply a word dropped during an interview, and a subsequent "explanation"). Orderinchaos 00:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 *  Delete Redirect As my username comes from the first Tool LP, I am obviously a huge fan. However, it's not notable, and would be best summed up in a sentence or two in the main article. the_undertow talk  00:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as already noted, there is NO independant notability for this "religion" beyond perhaps a 1-2 line mention in the article for Tool. Again, big fan of Tool and Perfect Circle here, but that doesn't mean that Wikipedia needs this article. --Jayron32| talk | contribs  01:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * As a side note, a pre-emptive redirect to Tool (band) may be appropriate, since it is likely this article will be recreated, leading to this again. --Jayron32| talk | contribs  01:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree. This term will most likely be googled by fans so your idea is a good one. the_undertow talk  01:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable subject with no independant third party sources. A short summary of it can be put into the main Tool article as already mentioned. Clearly it doesn't have enough independant sources to have its own article. AngelOfSadness  talk  01:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nomination. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 01:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete religioncruft. JuJube 02:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the band's page. JJL 03:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to band's pageBalloonman 07:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to band's page. Doczilla 08:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.