Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacostian view


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Yves Lacoste. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Lacostian view

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has remained an orphaned, unsourced stub of one sentence not explaining anything for nearly nine years. Short Google and Google Books searches come up with zero results not related to this article. With many works of Yves Lacoste not been translated into English and taking his generally huge influence on that field of study into account, I'd say there probably is something that might be dubbed a 'Lacostian approach to geopolitics', but still, to merit an article there would be the need to show that it couldn't be covered within the existing articles on Lacoste and geopolitics. Article had been tagged for proposed deletion in 2007, but the proposal was removed by the article's creator. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 09:43, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 12:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 12:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Yves Lacoste - since this subject is related to him, and this article is not developed. It would be hard to find anything on Lacostian view, if it exists. There's this, but it looks like other books taken from a wiki, though it doesn't say so. - Sidelight 12 Talk 12:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  02:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 14:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect as suggested and WP:CHEAP. We have resorted to redirecting one stub to another when the main topic is notable, but not individual concepts. Bearian (talk) 14:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.