Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacta Giurgiu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Lacta Giurgiu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable.The revenue is equivalent to to 5 million dollars a year, insufficient in a medium sized  country., and the refeences do not seem to meet WP:NCORP/  DGG ( talk ) 20:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment: Well, I'll list just a couple of references that may help establish its notability;
 * This study from 2016 states that "[W]e will analyze the most important aspects of the evolution of the dairy industry in Romania in the relevant period between 2003-2015, while having in view the Common Agricultural Policy (2014 - 2020). The main producers of dairy products that act on the market are: Albalact (Lactalis), LaDorna, Delaco, Brailact, Covalact, Lactate Natura Târgovişte, Napolact (Friesland), Muller, Carmolact Prod, Lactag, Lacta Giurgiu.";
 * Why Voiculescu and Chelu are fighting over Lacta Giurgiu - "Businessmen Dan Voiculescu and Catalin Chelu have begun powerful buying sprees on the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BVB) for the shares of Lacta Giurgiu (INEM), one of the few independent dairy producers on a market expected to exceed €2 billion in the coming three years.";
 * This site states that the company's revenue was 7.5 million dollars, not 5 million;
 * —capmo (talk) 04:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The first comment above shows only that it is one of the 10 leading ones; were it the leading one in market share, it would in my opinion show notability, tho that is not a formal guideline.
 * The second implies it's minor--that the overall market is €2 billion, and there are only a few independents left, does not indicate that it or any of the independents ae of major significance
 * Whether the updated figure is $5 million or $ 7.5 million, it's trivial--especially as the preceding comment showed the overall market is on the order of a billion. That's less than 1% market share.  DGG ( talk ) 01:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete None of the references (including the ones posted above) meet the criteria for establishing notability. Unless there are some analyst reports that covered this listed company behind paywalls, from what I can find there are no references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:37, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , what about the sources in ro:Lacta Giurgiu? (not watching, please )  czar  02:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.