Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lad Lake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Lad Lake

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No independent sources to prove notability Night of the Big Wind  talk  13:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep and Close - This source, already in the article prior to the nomination for deletion, is an independent source that "proves" notability:
 * Hess, Corrinne (July 25, 2010). Lad Lake wants boarding school The Business Journal of Milwaukee. Accessed May 2012.
 * Did the nominator even bother to read the source already in the article? This doesn't seem to be the case. This nomination is a waste of everyone's time; the nominator apparently didn't even take the time to read a source already in the article. I worry about the integrity of this nomination; what are the motives for it? Does deleting notable topics improve the encyclopedia? No. Why was this article nominated? Northamerica1000(talk) 09:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I did. The first one is their own website. The second one is a Crystal Ball-affair... By the way,that was back in 2010. The mentioned paper is silent about the boarding school, as are the school reports 2009 and 2010. So skip the boarding school as a failed project (unless you can find sources I couldn't find) Night of the Big Wind  talk  22:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - See also (added to the article):
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 09:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 09:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 09:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. TerriersFan (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Charitable institution of long standing, passes WP:GNG.--Arxiloxos (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.