Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladakhi Women's Travel Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Thinlas Chorol. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  10:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Ladakhi Women's Travel Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

If I'm reading this right, this is a prostitution service of no historic import. I have no idea what criteria this should be deleted under, but I sure don't see WP:N, and I do see plenty of WP:PROMO John from Idegon (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per nom. I also removed this promo-prostitution(?) page as an internal link from the pages Tourism in Ladakh, List of social enterprises, and List of social entrepreneurs, where it had been promotionally inserted. --FuzzyGopher (talk) 01:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * It is NOT a prostitution service, but a travel agency. I can see where did the word came from - Vandalism from an IP. Anup   [Talk]  22:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Thinlas Chorol: There is no substantial coverage of the company itself. Almost all sources are about the founder. Going through sources, it appears that the company has received media coverage because it was founded by a she, who we already have an article about (a female breaking through male-dominance). Plus, there is a lot of space of space available in target article where reliably sourced information about this agency can adequately be covered. Anup   [Talk]  22:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and then redirect given the current article is literally a blatant advertisement caring to literally list "The company wishes to say" or "The company sincerely thinks", that alone is sufficient for deletion as an unacceptable advertisement. SwisterTwister   talk  06:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Thinlas Chorol and any additional information in the article about the company that is significant should be added to her article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Thinlas Chorol and any necessary notable information in the article. Aru@baska ❯❯❯  Vanguard 09:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.