Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladeeda Farzana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Ladeeda Farzana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article simply fails notability criteria per WP:NOTE and WP:PERSON and also WP:CRYSTAL can't be done. It seems the article is made for getting promotion per WP:NOTPROMOTION. I would ask to delete the page. Dey subrata (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * delete and merge the subject fails general notability criteria, as well as WP:ANYBIO. I dont think the subject is notable enough to term as even a WP:BLP1E. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * update: I partially agree with 's comment/vote below. It makes sense to add merge selective content to protests' article. But I still believe even a redirect shouldnt be left behind. Whenever the subject becomes notable in future, the article can be created. (I also updated my bolded vote from "delete" to "del & merge" with this comment.) —usernamekiran (talk) 20:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * updated vote again to delete. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 'Delete or merge Agree sourcing is not strong enough to establish notability for her own article. Some sources are circular, referencing the India Today article which relies on her Facebook profile and a seemingly short interview.  In all the sources are largely focused her and Ayesha Renna  surrounding a viral video of their participation in the protests.  However, it may make sense to merge with the Citizenship Amendment Act protests article but if that is course I think Ayesha Renna should be included. This would also lay a foundation if either of them do become notable enough for their own article, which is a possibility.  S0091 (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * this would also lay foundation to create redirects for any person who has been covered in media sometime or someway. Talking generally - even though redirects are cheap, we should be careful about them. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I see your point U|usernamekiran and falls within WP:CRYSTAL I suppose. S0091 (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Per User:Dey subrata they have been added to the CAA article.  No need to merge. S0091 (talk)


 * mergeThere are no other events or activities she is engaged in to show that she is an activist. However, there sources that show she was a notable active participant in the Citizenship Amendment Act protests. This article should be merged with Citizenship Amendment Act protests.Watchbotx (talk) 12:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * ,, Nothing much to merge, one or two lines in the sub-section of Jamia Milia, thats it, which I will add soon there. Better to delete. Dey subrata (talk) 13:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. That'll just be fine too.Watchbotx (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Already added in the Jamia section. Dey subrata (talk) 00:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL  and really do not see much to merge either.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete BLP1E. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete without any merge. There is no content that is worthy to be added to the CAA protest. The incident with her happened with hundreds of others and does not merit a special mention. The BIO article being discussed here fails WP:BLP1E and even WP:GNG hence unfit to be kept here.  D Big X ray ᗙ  12:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: There's clearly not enough WP:SIGCOV to meet GNG, and I concur with the folks that point out BLP1E applies here. Waggie (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 *  Merge as per watchbotx commentGeorgiamarlins (talk) 11:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , nothing to merge, the required information are added in the main article of the protests. 14:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.