Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladies

Ladies was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to redirect the article to Lady.

Dictdef of a plural. Rick'''K 23:47, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * I thought a good vote would be to re-direct to Lady, but, because Lady re-directs to Nobility, that would be a double re-direct, so try a re-direct to Nobility. 66.245.23.108 23:49, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * This really should be a speedy delete. Noisy 00:59, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC) (Also, I tidied the entry up. Noisy)
 * Delete. Redir is useless, nobody should search on this or link to it, although I admit I've just changed a link from glove! Andrewa 01:05, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * If all lady does is redirect to nobility, then yes, delete this. And while we're at it, delete the lady redirect as well.  We have a gem of an article at gentleman, and the somewhat dubious redirect only fools people into thinking that its counterpart has already been written.  Smerdis of Tlön 03:04, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I have at least started lady now with the 1911 Britannica. Much more needs to be done there, maybe by a fan of feminist theorizing.  But now there's something for ladies to redirect to.  Smerdis of Tlön 03:18, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Cool, good work! +10 Wikipoints to you.--Samuel J. Howard 04:57, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to lady. -Sean Curtin 06:24, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)