Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladma (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Ladma
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seemingly NN "small comedy collective." Lots of claims of grandeur but nothing verifiable. Previous AFD result was  d elete.

I believe this should be deleted under CSD G4, but for some reason it was declined. It doesn't seem like the decliner bothered to read the previous AFD. Saltzman1959's comment there make it clear this is the same "small comedy collective." The Dissident Aggressor 19:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. The decliner did read the prior AFD, which was in January 2007, and noted that the article included plausible claims of significance from October 2007 and from 2008, neither of which could have been addressed in the original AFD. The content of the article is substantially different, and the logic of the original AFD wouldn't apply. Therefore, declining the G4 was a slam-dunk. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete and I'll often simply retag if it is applicable and as for this article, this has existed since February 2008 with no better improvement and frankly I'm not seeing any. Pinging and .  SwisterTwister   talk  07:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing doing here. Google says nn, the article says nn. Szzuk (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.