Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LadsLads.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

LadsLads.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No independent sources or indication of notability. Speedy deletion was declined for this article, although I sort of don't know why. P4k 23:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lofty claims of notability ("It claims to be "the most advanced...") are backed up by a single reference back to the domain in question. Yng  varr  23:38, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * De-lad "200,000 million unique accounts" That's a lot of spam, lads. --Victor falk 23:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't know why the speedy was declined either. Anyways, doesn't seem to be notable. - Rjd0060 00:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB, WP:V, and others. Stifle (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a propaganda piece. Should have been speedily deleted.  200 billion unique users is funny; what other planets do they cater to? CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete ad. JJL 01:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the speedy was declined as there was an assertion of ntability, so a request for sources to back up the assertion is appropriate. However, in googling around, I can find no reliable sources about this web site.  -- Whpq 17:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.