Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Gwynne Thompson

From VfD
Article does not establish notability. RickK 23:55, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Article does not establish credibility. Looks like it is a new rumor spreading at various wiccan forums by posters known only by their avatars without solid references. Mikkalai 01:11, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The same anon also propagates this in Wiccan Rede and Adriana Porter. If all this turns out to be true, both Lady Gwynne and Adriana Porter may be safely folded into Wiccan Rede. Mikkalai 01:26, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's true enough, and helpful. Wyss 03:23, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. --fvw *  04:07, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
 * Mistitled (unless her name was "Lady"). If you keep it, move it. Gdr 23:34, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, interesting and notable - checks google many reference Miffed 23:45, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * What makes her notable? She's a publisher of ONE poem?  RickK 23:19, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, needs expansion though. Megan1967 01:51, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Merging the info as a couple of words in Wiccan Rede obviates this entry entirely.
 * Delete. 91 hits, and the first is for a company in New South Wales. If verified, merge her and Adriana Porter into Wiccan Rede. Niteowlneils 20:26, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * keep Yuckfoo 04:41, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep she fameous. Witches lerv her. Salazar 02:46, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * User joined Jan 9 2005.
 * Delete, or merge and redirect if there isn't consensus to delete. &mdash;Ben Brockert (42) UE News  06:06, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Very marginal keep.  GRider\talk  22:40, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not establish notability, even if this stuff is true.  Publishing one obscure poem doesn't make you notable.  Gamaliel 23:18, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

end moved discussion