Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Mabel Fitzwilliam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-09 09:32Z 

Lady Mabel Fitzwilliam

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability; prod added in Nov 2006. Vintagekits 20:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, aristocratic, socialist politician. --Counter-revolutionary 20:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, That is true, however, that alone (being a local councillor with a minor title) would not make a person notable.--Vintagekits 21:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unless further notability is claimed. At the moment she is the granddaughter/sister of nobility with no title of her own, failing WP:BIO (and the proposed WP:NOBLE), and a local politician, again failing WP:BIO. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nuttah68 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Keep. Counter-revolutionary has added some useful references. --Eastmain 23:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, He has references have been added to say that she was a socialist local councillor, thats not notable.--Vintagekits 00:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete "well-known social worker" does not meet notability guidelines in my opinion. One Night In Hackney 303 01:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * keep Given the period, even the sketch of a career provided shows N.DGG 02:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep- Lady Mabel meets the criteria laid out in WP:BIO Astrotrain 09:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, which criteria - noting that WP:BIO states "Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislatures." - local councillor does not meet this criteria!--Vintagekits 00:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable in her own right (which was relatively unusual in those days) as well as the College being named after her. - Kittybrewster 18:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep:quite notable. David Lauder 10:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, "quite notable"!? how?--Vintagekits 00:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * To the admin closing this AfD, please note a number of editors who have !voted on this !vote have been involved in vote canvassing and now what another administrator has called “lock step” voting. Over the past months a number of editors have been accused of !voting on the basis of what “they like” rather than using the rationale of wiki policies. A number of central users such as Astrotrain, Kittybrewster, Counter-revolutionary, David Lauder, Major Bonkers but at times have also included Fraslet and to a lesser extent  Weggie and Gibnews and also El chulito and Inthegloaming who I very strongly suspect are/were socks.


 * This is a personal attack which I presume comes from User:vintagekits but is not signed. I have two socks and am wearing them on my feet. The following long rant has nothing to do with this AfD and some of the comments made are of a threatening nature. --Gibnews 01:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It would be a rant if no evidence was provided. It has everything to do with this AfD as it is a continuing pattern of behaviour.--Vintagekits 01:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * NOTE: the rest of the above discussion on "vote canvassing" has been moved to the talk page.


 * Keep as a "pioneer in education and social welfare". I would like to see more information in this article though. I'm sure it is available. Tyrenius 03:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, :If there were any details of how she was a "pioneer in education and social welfare" then I might agree with you however as the claim is made by "maltyonline" single line reference her I find that claim massively grandiose, also not that eachof the references used are local papers with zero details of any substance. --Vintagekits 09:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.