Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Margaret Sackville (1562–1591)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that sourcing requirements are met Nosebagbear (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Lady Margaret Sackville (1562–1591)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't inherit notability as the wife of an earl, especially since she died before he became an earl. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. I believe notability is demonstrated. Women of this period tend not to be recognised in the same way as their husbands, because they were nominally less powerful, but it seems to me that she was an eminent member of an eminent family. Deb (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article on a would-have-been countess meets WP:GNG; this article is well-sourced and detailed for a woman of her station and time. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment -- Does not being dedicatee of a poem by a notable poet provide some notability? Otherwise the content is mere genealogy. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Much of biography is "mere genealogy." Do you mean her Family tree? There is more than pedigree present in the article. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 17:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - an incredible number of independent sources for a woman of this period. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG and she's doing better than most women in the peerage project from this period! Missvain (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - highly notable and connected in her time. I also note she's related to the current ruling house. Bearian (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.