Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Paula Merry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete. 19:56, 8 September 2009 Nihiltres (talk | contribs) deleted "Lady Paula Merry" ‎ (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Lady Paula Merry

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article was just reduced to a stub due to issues of claimed original research, but I believe the article needs to be deleted. It is unsourceable using reliable sources, as far as I can tell. I can verify that the subject wrote a children's book and that's all; they are not the subject of any coverage in reliable sources, let alone significant coverage. Fences &amp;  Windows  00:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Delete Doesn't seem to be notable at all, from what I could tell from Google searches. Netalarm  talk  21:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, possible A7 speedy. As was clear from the longer version of the article, her (one) book was published by a vanity press, so it seems highly unlikely to be the source of any notability, and I don't see anything else. Even the long version of the article didn't have much that I can interpret as an assertion of significance. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not WP:A7. WP:A7 is not appropriate. Gosox5555 (talk) 02:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Speedy, thought WP:A7 was WP:G7.  I'm tired... Gosox5555 (talk) 02:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.