Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Starlight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 01:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Lady Starlight

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Lady Starlight was Lady Gaga's DJ partner. The latter found fame, the former did not. Lady Starlight fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. Some of the sources cited fail WP:RS and those that do not only mention her briefly due to her non-notable friendship with Lady Gaga (they are trivial mentions). Dale 15:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: Enough notable info available to warranty the article. Maybe the unreliable sources can be removed but deletion is completely unnecessary IMO. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 10:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Then the majority of sources will be removed, and we will have yet another uncited WP:BLP. Delete.   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 18:41, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The mentions in reliable sources are nowhere near the "substantial coverage" needed to show notability. Kevin (talk) 22:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Legolas. Dt128   let's talk  16:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Probably keep. I don't have a good sense of notability in this context, but the references, notably the award cited in ref. 1, seem to pass the minimum. Chutznik (talk) 02:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * She was awarded a non-notable award by a non-notable organisation. How does that pass WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC? Dale 10:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per Dale's source analysis. Joe Chill (talk) 12:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I don't agree with the deletion in any way. Please restore it.

69.236.174.71 (talk) 03:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC) Drew Harris