Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady of Maali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Mount Loura. Article has already been redirected so let's close it that way. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Lady of Maali

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Possibily hoax as the only reference to it that I could find is the unsourced article Mount Loura. Schuhpuppe (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Not a hoax. See the Guinea 10,000-franc banknote at this website. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Search for "Dame de Mali". See and various tourist guides at G-Books. In my opinion, redirect to Mount Loura is the most sensible outcome. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect to Mount Loura. The author of this article thinks that it is man-made but offers no evidence to that effect. &mdash; RHaworth 19:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment.

Regarding the origin of "the lady of mali" there are two dominant versions:

1. It is a natural granite formation.

2. It is made by man.

both versions are valid and accepted by scholars and nonacademic people, is necessary to respect the plurality of the media and even more because in Peru there are others findings even with correlation of similar attire.

1. I propose the restructuring of the article based on these two versions.

2. I invite you to join in the discussions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan L. Bacigalupo (talk • contribs) 13:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

 Your response: Pitoni Angelo; 1995 "Il mistero della vita" (original version in Italian). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.160.55.30 (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Could you cite any reliable sources for the second theory? --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 *  Delete Redirect to Mount Loura per nom, RHaworth, and author's track record. The former article now redirects to  per these edits, 19:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC), so the redirect and its target are now the subjects of this discussion.    — Jeff G. ツ 02:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Re the author's track record, this article and redirect, Palaeoarchaeology, and Supermegalith have been spammed several times by Juan L. Bacigalupo, using that account and using or influencing the users of various Peruvian IP Addresses matching 186.160/14, 190.43.160/19, and 190.81.128/17.   — Jeff G. ツ 08:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. Mount Loura and Lady of Maali are different concepts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.160.72.70 (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. I observe very little information about the "Lady of Mali"  this phenomenon occurs mainly in the English language. Tip: see "Lady of mali" in other languages. Please use translators, Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.160.53.168 (talk) 22:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.