Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady to tiger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete CSD A7, no assertion of notability (but also CSD G1). --Angelo (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Lady to tiger

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research, unreferenced, inaccurate and most likely as a result of watching 'the masked magician' on tv Kosmoshiva (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete:Don't think this worthy of an article. It isn't notable and there aren't even any sources. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability as no independent reliable sources are given. Article is likely 100% original reasearch and will probably not be verifyable. Guest9999 (talk) 00:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)]]
 * Change Article to Non-article. So, someone watched a trick on TV, named it Lady to tiger, and then goes on to tell us how he/she thinks the trick was pulled off?  How was this not speedied?   Keeper  |  76  00:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - per nom and Keeper.   jj137  ( Talk ) 02:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a speedy candidate. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete possibly speedily. Pure junk. Alberon (talk) 11:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.