Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laem Chabang municipal Stadium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Laem Chabang.  MBisanz  talk 18:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Laem Chabang municipal Stadium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced stub for more than 2 years. Kamafa Delgato (Lojbanist)Styrofoam is not made from kittens. 00:34, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Support to delete it. 124.120.38.245 (talk) 00:36, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, or "Speedy Keep" or "Procedural close". Nomination provides no rationale for deletion.  It is irrelevant that the article has not been edited recently. --Doncram (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only news coverage I could identify is this news piece mentioning how the club was renovating the stadium in 2013. I don't think it satisfies the GNG. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 08:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 07:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Doncram, would you consider changing your !vote, given my rationale that the subject fails the GNG? --Paul_012 (talk) 08:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to Laem Chabang. There is local coverage to support a mention in a broader article e.g. 1.--Pontificalibus 08:48, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to the section on Laem Chabang as per Pontificalibus. Not enough standalone notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.