Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laerta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Laerta

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per Robert McClenon - "Promotional stub on child model. The references show that the subject has been publicized by her parents and other agents, but no significant coverage by independent reliable sources."  LJF2019    talk   11:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   LJF2019    talk   11:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.   LJF2019    talk   11:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pretty clearcut un-notable, as well as having been (terribly) created by a sock. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 13:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. No questions here, quite clear-cut case. No real coverage or RS. --hroest 14:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. About as non-notable as it gets. Athel cb (talk) 14:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable child model. No significant coverage by independent reliable sources found.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No notable sources seen. Oaktree b (talk) 16:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per prior, but I do caution people to keep in mind their tone when the subject is someone who could viably read the debate, especially if that someone is a child. Dismissively talking about how unimportant and insignificant -- which is what "non-notable" sounds like to a non-Wikipedian -- a kid who can very well read you is comes across pretty harsh. Vaticidalprophet 02:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Per others, delete it.--Alcremie (talk) 07:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite her "cool and creative style", the subject does not meet GNG or NMODEL. --Kbabej (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.