Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laila Richard Sadeq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  04:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Laila Richard Sadeq

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm procedurally completing this nomination. It appears the "nominator" Justlit thought that a notability tag meant AfD and created this page in the wrong way to say keep. There are now delete !votes so the debate should not be closed due to this error and I have added the AfD tag to the article. So the article may end up being deleted because somebody (a large contributer) wanted to keep it! Oh, the irony. PrimeHunter 13:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: the following comments were added before this was properly listed and may be votestacking.


 * Send to cleanup . Keep. This is a young actress Actually has some minimal content but needs to be cleaned up and stubbed . --User:Justlit 01:49, Jun 24, 2007 (UTC)

--User:Xxdisneyxfanxx 06:49, Jun 24, 2007 (UTC) — Xxdisneyxfanxx (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  James   Luftan  contribs 18:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * keep Laila Richard Sadeq the article should not be deleted because if this person has never acted before howcome there are fan videos and fan sites like wet paintwet,msn groups and 35 blogs on blogger and there might be some future so if you delete this article the next time disney comfirms the world of this actress then you are lost.

--miley hilary 10:49, Jun 24, 2007 — Miley hilary (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  James   Luftan  contribs 18:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * i agree keep this article i went on laila richard sadeq at msn groups and i found a lot of pictures and keep these articles for the following reasons * although laila's is not yet a disney channel star she is still considered a professional actress and although ms sadeq has not had any references or sites that claim these obligations i believe that disney fans know that stub wikipedia articles and topix forums are nothing but how are they actually reading these stub article and forums and actually making these fan videos on sites like youtube ( the weirdest thing is youtubers are actually watching videos about this person who wikipedians like Nlwiki claim that has never acted well what do you think now Nlwiki have you seen how many people watch those youtube fan videos ha ha ha.


 * Comment. This debate was added to the AfD log 10.50, 8 August 2007 (UTC) by Nlwiki, when the article still had no AfD tag. PrimeHunter 13:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: Discussion continues here. Please note that this is not a majority vote.


 * I noticed someone has put a lot of effort into trying to create a notifiable person out of someone who isn't. This person is not an actress who has been in any movie according to IMDb. This seems to be the case for all 6 mentioned movies on her page. I have tried to put a notability tag on het page but anonymous users keep removing them. The only mentioned external link is "Laila Richard Sadeq' s MySpace" and it links to www.myspace.com and not to a profile of an user on myspace. I hope other Wikipedia users look into this because I think articles like this one doesn't do any good for Wikipedia's credibility. Nlwiki 10:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete . Non Notable. incidently as far i can see Xxdisneyxfanxx fan has contributed to wikipedia since this morning, and has made quiet an effort on their userpage 3tmx 10:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC).


 * User Miley hilary was also created 7 August and the date in both of their comments above shouldn't be "24 June" but "7 August" Nlwiki 11:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Sock puppets?? 3tmx 11:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC) This appears to me to be  a typical example of people missuing wikipedia for promotion. Basically the argument that she may become famous is rubbish as we don't speculate about these thing on wikipedia. 3tmx 11:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:N, specifically WP:BIO... also the majority of information there simply isn't verified. Let's also try and keep this civil, please. OBM | blah blah blah 11:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Right, but i think the sudden creation of these two users needs to be looked into 3tmx 11:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Has this article been nominated properly for deletion? I can't find any evidence that the article has been tagged. Not only is it not mentioned in the history, but a page by page search for the last several days doesn't show any sign. --Moonriddengirl 11:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Er, yeah... excellent point. OBM | blah blah blah 12:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Well i think it should be nominated. 3tmx 12:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: Justlit appears to have copied the first few lines of Articles for deletion/Alexa Nikolas.  W ODU P  12:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:V, looks like a really stretched effort to make something out of nothing. Hersfold (talk/work) 13:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Actress does not seem to have sufficient notability yet, and some of these claims--like the Barney one--are unverifiable. --Moonriddengirl 13:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I just checked the "what links here" pages and the Rose love-page (about an upcoming album of Laila) seems to contain misleading information. The only reference used (a PDF-file) doesn't contain any information about the Rose love album. Nlwiki 13:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable.  Dei z  talk 13:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per notability. If the person does something notable and verifiable, it can always come back. --kateshortforbob 14:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Not notable. Her biggest role is in Horton Hears a Who, and even thats a cameo.  James   Luftan  contribs 17:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Isn't it funny how some votes are marked 10:49 24 Jun 2007 (which is wrnog anyway since it isn't UTC), yet this AfD started today?  James   Luftan  contribs 17:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

CommentThe other thing i'd point out about XXDisneyfanxx is they have stated they live in England, but also they have a box that says they live in florida. They created their user page yesterday so its not like they 'forgot' to update it. Even more suspicious. 3tmx 17:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC) and "their" page was created 10 mins after justlit finished his edits to this page (go by this pages history - not time the first three editors have signed)

3tmx 18:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Reply I like how similar they're usernames are!  James   Luftan  contribs 18:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete wikipedia is not imdb and this person is a non-notable starlet. Bigdaddy1981 22:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Looks like a hoax for someone who may not even be an actress at all. -- Groggy Dice T | C 02:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Fails WP:BIO. wikipediatrix 16:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as acting in a failed pilot is not in itself notable if that's all one has done. Pat Payne 21:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax, imdb never heard of her. Nothing of substance with a Google search, it looks like somebody has made this person up and spammed the net.  answers.yahoo.com even had a question about her, and the questioner eventually came to the conclusion that "somebody made her up".  Corvus cornix 22:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Exactly. They "spammed the net" to give the appearance that she was famous. I.e. tag youtube videos w/ her name (fan vids) make a tv.com user profile (to give the appearance of an actual profile), Fuck, the top two google searches are here (understandable), and my usertalk page!!! I even filed a sockpuppetry case for Justlit, Disneyfan, and miley hilary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Xxdisneyxfanxx (changed sockpuppeteer as more evidence beacame available).  James   Luftan  contribs 02:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.