Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laing family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  03:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Laing family

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability and verifiability issues

Stub, unsourced (general ref is dead link), created by sus account who only ever edited one other, related, article RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I mean, we would merge to the construction company, but there is one primary source used for this stub. I don't see the point. A Gsearch for "Laing family" brings up every family history site on Ancestry and elsewhere that have the same name. Oaktree b (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.