Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laiquendi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Sundering of the Elves. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Laiquendi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article does not indicate how it meets notability. Only one primary reference is used. GimliDotNet (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable or significant enough for an entire article to itself. --Bajazeth.  And think to rouse us from our dreadful siege / Of the famous Grecian Constantinople 21:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Trim and merge to Sundering of the Elves. De728631 (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge per De728631. Much like we'd merge non-notable characters from a notable fictional work into a list, this particular racial offshoot can be covered in a list article. Jclemens (talk) 07:38, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge so the article doesnt keep getting recreated. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Change to Merge References have been added now, but would be better served in Sundering of the Elves GimliDotNet (talk) 13:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge There are three independent sources in the article now. I think it meets all but one of the criteria for general notability—I wouldn't call the coverage significant. The overwhelming majority give the topic just a few sentences, although the entry in Foster (1971) is about 100 words. Based on Notability (fiction) I agree it would do well as part of a list, or as a section in another article. I think Nandor might be a better place for it, but maybe that's a discussion we should continue on Talk:Laiquendi. Regards. Braincricket (talk) 14:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.