Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Hodges Bridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep based on WP:RS evidence presented by NE2 and Cazort. Non-admin closure. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Lake Hodges Bridge

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not a notable bridge. Rschen7754 (T C) 20:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Newspaper articles cover the current project and probably the older ones. One about the current project has a nice history of the original bridge. That's more than enough to satisfy notability. --NE2 22:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per the multiple in-depth secondary sources about this topic as indicated by NE2. --Oakshade (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep it is a quite notable bridge, judging from the article text. Laudak (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Personally, I find this article interesting. Another source:, and a historical reference to the old bridge:  My only question...why don't we have a page on Lake Hodges?  Cazort (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Because you did not write one yet. Seriously though, there is stub article on the Lake Hodges Dam. Lake and dam articles are often combined. •••Life of Riley (talk) 02:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is not policy, but there is a notion of inherent notability for some things, including sizable bridges. DEFACTO.  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  04:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.