Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Homes Realty (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 18:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Lake Homes Realty
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable company, article has been deleted twice (previous AFDs). Does not meet CSD criteria because the sources have changed since the last deletion. However, the new sources provide no support for WP:NORG or WP:GNG. Summary of the refs at the time of nomination:
 * 1) PR release from company, not sigcov of it
 * 2) About Don Logan selling his property, not sigcov of the company
 * 3) PR release from company, not sigcov of it
 * 4) Real estate listings of properties for sale
 * 5) No mention of company
 * 6) No mention of company
 * 7) No mention of company
 * 8) No mention of company
 * 9) Brief mention
 * 10) Real estate listings of properties for sale

If this AFD results in deletion, I also propose WP:SALT. Schazjmd  (talk)  18:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Alabama.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete (possible CSD G4?): An article by a new 11-edits-then-create-in-mainspace WP:SPA covering the same ground as the articles deleted twice before. As I said in the July 2022 nomination, I can't see the July 2020 deleted article, but the current instance looks similar to last summer's and falls under the same points covered in that deletion decision. No reason to overturn these past decisions about lack of notability and WP:SALT would seem reasonable at this time. AllyD (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. —Alalch E. 23:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. There was nothing notable last time and still nothing. Salt as well. Oaktree b (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and 'Salt as per nom. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion.  HighKing++ 18:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per . This clearly, based on the analysis of sources, that this is just spam. I am in accord with deterring for-profit sales persons and companies from using and abusing our not-for-profit status. It's 2023, and everyone knows what we are and are not. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and recommend close — not much of a debate here. My reasoning for deletion is similar to the other editors above. No need to artifically draw this AfD out. KlayCax (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Tough call, but ultimately non-notable by GNG and NCORP guidelines. Shawn Teller (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.