Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Madera Country Estates, California (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Lake Madera Country Estates, California
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another subdivision which should have been deleted on the first try but which was kept because of a group nom. Since maybe one of those at most should have been kept, here we go around again. Again, it was entered from the mysterious Occidental College map and then applied to the topos, but it's obviously a large subdivision, and references to it in law say so. It seems to have some existence as a district of some kind within the county, but I'm not convinced that this means legal recognition of a settlement. Everything else is real estate. Mangoe (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable subdivision. The only coverage in newspapers.com is one WP:MILL story from the '80s over a local land-use dispute. Homeowners opposed an ORV park at the lake south of the subdivision and won. Doesn't meet WP:GEOLAND. Jfire (talk) 06:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with nominator, sweep it away.James.folsom (talk) 07:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.