Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Owego Camp for Boys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --- Gl e n 04:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Lake Owego Camp for Boys
Another nn camp in my general area. I can't see how notability could be asserted. Daniel Case 03:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ---Charles 04:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable camp. --Ter e nce Ong (T 04:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm assuming that summer children's camps are not usually considered notable, and if this is so, this one seems to be no different from hundereds of others. Herostratus 05:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think most camps are generally notable in the same way schools are, but this one reads like an advertisement. &rArr;    SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  08:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. &mdash; Khoikhoi 22:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and consistent with Hero's proposition that childern's summer camps are generally non-notable, toward which one may consider, inter al., the reasoning of Articles for deletion/Camp Wachusett. Joe 00:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This camp appears to be a private business as it was "created by the Black family", so WP:CORP applies.  There is no assertion or evidence of meeting WP:CORP in the article.  GRBerry 01:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd imagine that most summer camps are private businesses, but so too are some for-profit schools (and, for that matter, bands), and so, in situations such as this, I'd suggest that a camp could fail WP:CORP and nevertheless be notable in view of other characteristics (similar to those for which we'd think a group to be notable), although I can't conceive of what any of those characteristics might be (in view of camps' being generally non-notable); in any event, I don't suppose the distinction matters vis-à-vis this AfD. Joe 03:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.