Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake discharge problem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Open-channel flow. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Lake discharge problem

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nonencyclopedic mathematical/physical treatise. The problem itself does not seem notable to me. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 19:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  19:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect, to open channel flow. The current article fails WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. SailingInABathTub 🛁 09:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Engineering. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 01:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect, to open channel flow. This is another problem solution article from a Texas Tech engineering course in 2013 with a link to the instructors class notes. See also Articles for deletion/Momentum–depth relationship in a rectangular channel. This is not the place to collect problem solutions. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.