Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake of Stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nobody but the nominator is arguing for deletion so that's not happing. Therefore the choice is between "keep" and "no consensus" and it seems to me that with the sources provided by Cunard, it squeeks by. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Lake of Stars

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy G11 declined. Music festival with unclear notability, and the article is somewhat promotional. No third-party references. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 20:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. While this article certainly has issues, it is well written for an article by a newbie. Given that we have a systemic bias favoring technical issues, white race, developed nations, and the nothern hemisphere, we should be glad to have this beginning article, welcome the new, dedicated editor, and help them, instead of overwhelming them with templates after templates and repeated deletion threats. &mdash; Sebastian 22:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:N. See this article from ic Liverpool and this article from Resident Advisor. There are many more sources on Google News Archive. Cunard (talk) 23:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know about the Resident Advisor page: it looks like a blog to me. The IC Liverpool site sounds interesting, though. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The Resident Advisor is a local magazine, and the article is posted in the "Local News/United Kingdom" category, so I can't see how it's a blog. Cunard (talk) 00:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  20:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.