Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakhiupr HS School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "Completely unsourced" decides the matter; WP:V compliance is mandatory. At the least after seven days of AfD.  Sandstein  22:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Lakhiupr HS School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable secondary school, no independent coverage found. buidhe 17:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. buidhe 17:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 17:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: WP:BITE. This article is two days old! It is a stub! It is a stub- allow it to draw breath. A due diligence search needs to have be done- we are all fammiliar with the caveat: Because extant secondary schools often have reliable sources that are concentrated in print and/or local media, a deeper search than normal is needed to attempt to find these sources. At minimum, this search should include some local print media. If a deep search is conducted, and still comes up empty, then the school article should be deleted for not meeting the GNG - Editors are not expected to prove the negative that sources do not exist, but they should make a good-faith effort to find them. Return to the question when this as been done- in the meantime the editor working in this area needs a lot of support. ClemRutter (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * My intention isn't to bite new users. As a new page patroller I'm expected to nominate non notable subjects for deletion. The age of the article doesn't change the notability or lack thereof. If you think it's notable, please show me the sources. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 20:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify or delete - the article is completely unsourced, creator should have time to work on the article, however significant coverage in reliable, independent sources for this school may be a problem. I'm finding mostly directory listings. Also stubs are to be avoided per the school article guidelines. Steven (Editor) (talk) 00:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No coverage on internet. Fails WP:SIGCOV. GargAvinash (talk) 05:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment if we keep this it will need a page move as there’s a typo in the title. Mccapra (talk) 06:52, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.