Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakishar Baba Ashram Chulkana Dhaam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jamie ☆ S93  17:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Lakishar Baba Ashram Chulkana Dhaam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I've just declined the speedy on this as I'm not certain that A7 covers a religious place of worship. Is a church a club/organisation in that context? Perhaps, perhaps not, so bringing here for wider opinion. If consensus heads to A7 speedy delete, then I'm not going to disagree. Ged UK  15:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * As the one who tagged the page speedy delete, I maintain my opinion that the article's subject is an organization and is therefore subject to A7. May I ask why it would not? ~EdGl   &#9733;  15:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 18:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I think you are correct that an ashram is an organization, in the same category as churches and monasteries. It is also a place just like a church is also a place.  I don't see any in-depth coverage in reliable resources in non-Indian languages.  In fact, it looks like someone is attempting to put the name in as many places as possible. I would recommend someone check in the appropriate Indian language, though, to avoid cultural discrimination.  This might be a giant ashram with many books written about it for all I know. Drawn Some (talk) 23:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, unless reliable sources can be found to show it is notable, or even exists. Priyanath talk 06:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly, without prejudice. Currently, there's nothing to show that this ashram is more notable than any other place of worship. Web searches in the Roman alphabet may be an inadequate way to find if sources could be added. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability. Hekerui (talk) 02:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.