Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakota (band) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Lakota (band)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced and fails WP:NBAND. Eat me, I'm a red bean (talk · contribs) 02:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails both WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. I couldn't find any independent secondary sources to satisfy either criterion. The sources provided in the first AfD are either dead, or don't appear to be secondary and peer-reviewed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep - I don't see anything here that addresses the previous AfD's consensus, and specifically the sources presented by (none of which are lost or truly dead: Hybrid Magazine, Static Multimedia, Splendidezine, Ear Candy Mag, Left off the Dial, Mammoth Press, AltPress). That they were not integrated in the article years after is an editorial cleanup problem, not one of notability or deletion. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't feel that the sources that exist are sufficient. Most of the things I found in the first AfD are not good enough sources to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 06:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * With those sources it would be a weak keep if at all but as my searches found nothing better, I'll go with delete for now as there's simply not much else (feel free to draft and userfy if needed). Pinging previous commenter . SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, come to think of it, most of the reviews may or may not be WP:RS and I'm finding literally nothing else but a handful of reviews. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:48, 27 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.