Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakshmi Shruti Settipalli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Lakshmi Shruti Settipalli

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sources run of the mail facebook account, imdb, all and all poorly sourced. Sources are not secdondary or independent dont meet WPINDP or WP:SIRS Comintell (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women,  and Tamil Nadu.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: All I find are PR items, which at least confirms it's written by ANI PR,  and , none of which are RS.  Oaktree b (talk) 15:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article needs inline citations and may have originated for promotional purposes, but still meets notability. I dug through the listed sources and converted the bare URLs into citations. It turns out that two of the sources do provide significant coverage that is independent and reliable. "Lakshmi Shruti Setttipalli Was Intrigued by Squash When She First Saw It Played" is published in Prosquash, the leading source for squash in India (where the sport is big). The other solid source is the extensive article, "I Want To Be The Best" in the Deccan Chronicle. Rublamb (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sources highlighted by  appear to demonstrate WP:GNG. ~Kvng (talk) 22:07, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. As has been pointed out, there is some coverage. That said, it falls short a bit of the WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 02:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't see what's wrong with the Deccan Chronicle article; that's an extensive full-page feature story. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.