Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakshmi Tatma (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Specific in-article BLP issues may be addressed through the rigorous removal of questionable content, in accordance with the biographies of living persons policy. Black Falcon (Talk) 07:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Lakshmi Tatma

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Queried delete for notability. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Loads of references, including a Channel 4 documentary about her? I don't understand how the notability is in question. --Canley (talk) 07:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable. passes WP:V easily. Sting au  Buzz Me...   11:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, certainly notable, plenty of third-party refs. My main hesitation is BLP concerns, but I think that is covered by the parents' having given permission for the Channel 4 documentary. Several statements in the article still need to be sourced. NSH001 (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I took some information from the corresponding Chinese Wikipedia page (click on 中文 at the bottom of the left column in page Lakshmi Tatma; it is in Traditional Chinese, not Simplified Chinese). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I know that the last AfD featured a great deal of concern about BLP, but given the huge number of highly reliable sources (CNN, BBC, CBS, NBC and CBC) reporting this information, little Lakshmi clearly has moved into the realm of public figures.  She's notable, and the information is verifiable, and should be kept.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xymmax (talk • contribs) 15:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * keep. If notable enough for her to be on the Bodyshock series, notable enough for an article. I am sooooo cool!   22:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.