Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakuna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep but with no prejudice against a merge, which was even suggested by the nominator (just a reminder, you don't need to send an article to AfD to merge it). There is clearly a consensus against deletion so the article can either be expanded with more sources or merged to David Narcizo. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Lakuna

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't appear to meet WP:N. Possible ATD is redirect or merge/redirect to David Narcizo. Has been in CAT:NN for 12 years; hopefully, we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 21:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 11:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 15:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 15:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has lots of good reviews to establish notability. Even if someone else has tagged the article for notability, the nominator still needs to do a thorough WP:BEFORE. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete One of the refs you put in, needs a login. I suppose from a historical viewpoint, if they were popular, the article would have been worth keeping, but they were fairly obscure even back in the day. They are really quite good. The reviews are from blogs. They're is no mainstream reference amongst them, i.e. reliable. They're SPS sources.    scope_creep Talk  13:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The Austin Chronicle does not appear to be a blog. Plus as the project has been inactive for years it is likely there were sources at the time that are now inaccessible or lost. NemesisAT (talk) 15:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to David Narcizo. There is no reason to have a separate article as the Narcizo article is rather short.4meter4 (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.